Game Theory of AI Warfare: Build It or Lose?

for any anyone who wants to go and read, you know, any nerds out there who care about economics and and gaming to an extent as well. But any decision that you take is not a decision that's taken in isolation. It's taken with the understanding that someone else is also playing this game and also has to take a decision which can impact the outcome that happens to you. And what the Department of War, what the US government has to think about is if they are to not develop this technology and another country is to develop this technology, what does that mean for the national security of Americans? And the challenge that I've got with not developing it is if they make that decision, because ultimately, it's a yes or no decision, have we going to invest and we're going to make it or we're not. If they do make that decision to not invest in that AI for, you know, autonomous warfare and a China for example makes the decision to do it, US is finished haha. It's finished, it's over, because what you can effectively do then, imagine the scale at which you can create, cause we know these humanoid robots are coming. So imagine now US goes on the, you know, you know kind of Nobel Prize peace route and China decides actually we're just going to create a million humanoid robots who indiscriminate decide if they're going to shoot people or even if it's in the air, however they want to do it. The speed and scale of which they'll be able to do that is not going to be able to be matched with with human, you know, with humans. So I don't even, although it's a I see it almost as a necessary evil, that they have to at least develop the capability so that they can come to the negotiation